meladoodle:

i bet in 2000 years theyre gonna be digging up the rubble of our destroyed earth and they’ll find a nokia still on half battery

(via the-absolute-funniest-posts)

jtotheizzoe:

astrotastic:

Jesus Christ you guys.

If you wish to make waffles from scratch, you must first invent the universe.

(via drthunder138)

vengeance-of-synners:

coolinfantryguy:

mollyiswideawake:

mentalalchemy:

I’d feel like a little bitch if I didn’t reblog this

I lost it at “bitch mittens”

cant bitch out now

"bitch sticker"

(via the-absolute-funniest-posts)

kingoftheheelstate:

ezzii-thaweirdo:

Lmfao !! 😂

LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

I could watch Snooki get punched in the face for hours

(via drthunder138)

tenaflyviper:

IF the one-in-four statistic is correct—it is sometimes modified to “one-in-five to one-in-four”—campus rape represents a crime wave of unprecedented proportions. No crime, much less one as serious as rape, has a victimization rate remotely approaching 20 or 25 percent, even over many years. The 2006 violent crime rate in Detroit, one of the most violent cities in America, was 2,400 murders, rapes, robberies, and aggravated assaults per 100,000 inhabitants—a rate of 2.4 percent. The one-in-four statistic would mean that every year, millions of young women graduate who have suffered the most terrifying assault, short of murder, that a woman can experience. Such a crime wave would require nothing less than a state of emergency—Take Back the Night rallies and 24-hour hotlines would hardly be adequate to counter this tsunami of sexual violence. Admissions policies letting in tens of thousands of vicious criminals would require a complete revision, perhaps banning boys entirely.

— Heather Mac Donald, "The Campus Rape Myth".

This alleged “statistic” was culled from a survey of 3,000 college women in 1982, conducted by Ms. Magazine.  These women were asked only three questions:

  1. Have you had sexual intercourse when you didn’t want to because a man gave you alcohol or drugs?
  2. Have you had sexual intercourse when you didn’t want to because a man threatened or used some degree of physical force to make you?
  3. Have you had sexual acts when you didn’t want to because a man threatened to use some degree of physical force to make you?

The trouble is, many of the women the survey counted as “victims” did not actually feel that they had been raped, especially not the entire third of the alleged “victims” that continued to have a consensual sexual relationship with their supposed attacker.  Others that had consensual one-night-stands that they later regretted were also counted as “victims”. 

When you have to lie about the prevalence of a crime, you’re not doing women any favors.

Feminism is supposed to be empowering, not to send us cowering.

Rape is not the “epidemic” that people are trying to claim it is.  It has actually decreased dramatically in the past few decades - up to 80% since 1979, despite an increase in the willingness of victims to report them.  This is even further supported by data directly from the U.S. Bureau of Justice.

The only thing that HAS been increasing are FALSE reports of rape, which do a lot more harm to the lives of others than you may want to believe.

Third wave feminism is operating under far too many logical fallacies.  The Big Lie Technique is readily apparent in the use of the very “statistic” above which has time and again been proven to be false.  Overgeneralization continually tries to paint all men as monsters, when science has shown us that there are many psychological and biological factors that come into play to create someone with the potential to commit violence

If you have to spread lies to support your cause, how much of a cause could you possibly have to begin with?  And what are you saying about femininity itself when you want so badly for us to live in constant fear?

How is this supposed to be encouraging women to be strong if all you let us aspire to is to be victims?

How is this encouraging women to be independent if you try to make us believe that we can’t take care of ourselves?

How are you helping women at all if you have to lie to us?

(via stubmle)

sapient-wartortle:

psycho333:

disneyvillainsforjustice:

draumbouy:

soullesspunkprincess:

sapient-wartortle:

imminentdeathsyndrome:

Four college women beat up a homeless man for no reason. None of them were arrested or named in any articles I’ve seen with this story. So this is the patriarchal society feminists claim oppresses women, huh? [source]

Not all women…

Okay let me explain a thing about patriarchy that a lot of “MRA” and likewise seem to just not get. Patriarchy DOES NOT simply mean men have it *better* than women do. It is far more complex than that. Is this incident a product of patriarchy? Absofreakinglutely and similarly when women get off easy for rape and abuse. Women are often not taken seriously in a legal setting or in physical altercations, because women are seen as weaker and inferior in this way. Feminism exists to disband this. Yes we want equality for women and benefits for women but it doesn’t end there. Feminists want boys to be allowed to wear pink and cry and express emotions. Feminists want girls charged and arrested for assault. Feminists want it brought to the light that domestic abuse goes BOTH ways. So don’t you dare sit here and spit at feminism because a group of girls got off of a crime. Being oppressed does not always mean getting lesser treatment. It means being VIEWED as lesser. And sometimes that gets you off easy. That doesn’t make it good.

women in this society represented right here arent oppressed and oppression doesn’t work based on how people are viewed prejudice does. to be oppressed your gov’t has to be exploiting you and it isnt. women have rights that men don’t. constitutionally women are more privileged than men. so no you arent oppressed. and dont give me the wage gap discrimination bs argument. the equal pay act of 1963 prohibits women from being paid less than men based on sex. and there are like thirty different sources explaining why its not real. theres also a video. and another from the independent womens forum

there isn’t a single women’s problem other than abortion that isn’t also a mens problem as well.

so no you aren’t oppressed. find me any right that men have that you don’t. you cant it doesn’t exist.

and patriarchy isnt real either. heres a great explaination of why that isnt real with links too. 

now i think the most outrageous thing you’re spouting is that feminists actually seek to help men. or that they ever have.

in fact the compete opposite is true. feminists have on multiple occasions battled AGAINST mens issues in court. and the majority of major feminists are gendercidal maniacs i fact one of the most famous feminists of all time who played an instrumental role in creating this bs patriarchy theory made a book about reducing the male population down and using them for breeding. its called the S.C.U.M. manifesto and if you crack it open i think you’ll find it reads much like hitlers: mein kompf.

even the original feminists, or suffragettes as they were called, were raving white supremacists.

so im sorry but all this crap about feminism you’ve been spouting is lies. feminists fight to harm men. and while you’re right, they sure as hell didnt have anything to do with this particular incedent, they certainly do a whole lot of stuff like this.

good enough sapient-wartortle?

Doing me proud.
- Ratigan (aka sapient-wartortle)

((I bet if the genders were reversed all of the attackers names would be plastered all over the fucking place. ))

Truth. They would be.

Feminists don’t want equality, they don’t want to help men or real women, they don’t want to be held accountable for their actions or words, they cherry pick “rights” and believe they’re entitled to whatever they want because their women. They’re a disgrace, they’re just as bad as every man that beats his wife or girlfriend or the rapists they spout on about. You know who actually wants equality? The real women than don’t waste time complaining and hating on everything, the ones that work their asses off and don’t expect or take shortcuts. The women that raise their kids, take care of their home and husband and still make an effort to work they DE MA ND respect because not only to they deserve it but they also give it to others men women gay straight they don’t care. Feminists give real women a bad name, it’s easy to blame men for everything and never have to own up to anything or have an excuse that you’re oppressed. How many feminists wake up each day and flee their village so they don’t get their heads chopped off? How many are being sold by their husbands or boyfriends? How many are bring forced into ghettos loaded into trains and killed by the dozen? Oppression isn’t gender specific and feminist aren’t fucking oppressed. Women deserve respect they deserve to be held to every single standard a man is. Equality mean equal not more not less.

(via stubmle)

deducecanoe:

brynndestructible:

death-limes:

venipede:

osteophagy:

endcetaceanexploitation:

Washoe was a chimp who was taught sign language.
One of Washoe’s caretakers was pregnant and missed work for many weeks after she miscarried. Roger Fouts recounts the following situation:
"People who should be there for her and aren’t are often given the cold shoulder—her way of informing them that she’s miffed at them. Washoe greeted Kat [the caretaker] in just this way when she finally returned to work with the chimps. Kat made her apologies to Washoe, then decided to tell her the truth, signing "MY BABY DIED." Washoe stared at her, then looked down. She finally peered into Kat’s eyes again and carefully signed "CRY", touching her cheek and drawing her finger down the path a tear would make on a human (Chimpanzees don’t shed tears). Kat later remarked that one sign told her more about Washoe and her mental capabilities than all her longer, grammatically perfect sentences." [23]
Washoe herself lost two children; one baby died shortly after birth of a heart defect, the other baby, Sequoyah, died of a staph infection at two months of age.

more about Washoe:
after the death of her children, researchers were determined to have Washoe raise a baby and brought in a ten month chimpanzee named Loulis. one of the caretakers went to Washoe’s enclosure and signed “i have a baby for you.” Washoe became incredibly excited, yelling and swaying from side to side, signing “baby” over and over again. then she signed “my baby.”
the caretaker came back with Loulis, and Washoe’s excitement disappeared entirely. she refused to pick Loulis up, instead signing “baby” apathetically; it was clear that the baby she thought she was getting was going to be Sequoyah. eventually Washoe did approach Loulis, and by the next day the two had bonded and from then on she was utterly devoted to him.
*information shamelessly paraphrased from When Elephants Weep by Jeffrey Masson.

Even more interestingly, after Washoe and Loulis bonded, she started teaching him American Sign Language the same way that human parents teach their children language. It only took Loulis eight days to learn his first sign from Washoe, and aside from the seven that his human handlers learned around him, he learned to speak in ASL just as fluently as Washoe and was able to communicate with humans in the same way she could.

now if y’all don’t think this is the tightest shit you can get outta my face

LOOK. UP. CHANTEK. PLZ AND THX.

WOW.


And people say there’s no proof or possible way that we could ever evolve from monkeys. To them I send a resounding “fuck you and your arrogance” the fact remains that most monkeys are better people then most people are

deducecanoe:

brynndestructible:

death-limes:

venipede:

osteophagy:

endcetaceanexploitation:

Washoe was a chimp who was taught sign language.

One of Washoe’s caretakers was pregnant and missed work for many weeks after she miscarried. Roger Fouts recounts the following situation:

"People who should be there for her and aren’t are often given the cold shoulder—her way of informing them that she’s miffed at them. Washoe greeted Kat [the caretaker] in just this way when she finally returned to work with the chimps. Kat made her apologies to Washoe, then decided to tell her the truth, signing "MY BABY DIED." Washoe stared at her, then looked down. She finally peered into Kat’s eyes again and carefully signed "CRY", touching her cheek and drawing her finger down the path a tear would make on a human (Chimpanzees don’t shed tears). Kat later remarked that one sign told her more about Washoe and her mental capabilities than all her longer, grammatically perfect sentences." [23]

Washoe herself lost two children; one baby died shortly after birth of a heart defect, the other baby, Sequoyah, died of a staph infection at two months of age.

more about Washoe:

after the death of her children, researchers were determined to have Washoe raise a baby and brought in a ten month chimpanzee named Loulis. one of the caretakers went to Washoe’s enclosure and signed “i have a baby for you.” Washoe became incredibly excited, yelling and swaying from side to side, signing “baby” over and over again. then she signed “my baby.”

the caretaker came back with Loulis, and Washoe’s excitement disappeared entirely. she refused to pick Loulis up, instead signing “baby” apathetically; it was clear that the baby she thought she was getting was going to be Sequoyah. eventually Washoe did approach Loulis, and by the next day the two had bonded and from then on she was utterly devoted to him.

*information shamelessly paraphrased from When Elephants Weep by Jeffrey Masson.

Even more interestingly, after Washoe and Loulis bonded, she started teaching him American Sign Language the same way that human parents teach their children language. It only took Loulis eight days to learn his first sign from Washoe, and aside from the seven that his human handlers learned around him, he learned to speak in ASL just as fluently as Washoe and was able to communicate with humans in the same way she could.

now if y’all don’t think this is the tightest shit you can get outta my face

LOOK. UP. CHANTEK. PLZ AND THX.

WOW.

And people say there’s no proof or possible way that we could ever evolve from monkeys. To them I send a resounding “fuck you and your arrogance” the fact remains that most monkeys are better people then most people are

(via eszturd)

rallyyy:

the-exercist:

fitblrholics:

If you look at the ingredients list and it’s a bunch of words you don’t even know… neither does your body (x)

Just like if you break apples and grapefruit down into their chemical components, I’m willing to bet that most people wouldn’t recognize the “ingredients” either. It’s a bunch of words you don’t even know:

Don’t use these scare tactics - Chemicals aren’t inherently bad. Literally everything is made up chemicals. Trust me, your body knows what niacin is. It knows how to digest fructose and calcium sulfate. Even if you only consume the most basic and “real” foods that are pulled directly off the vine, you’re still ingesting a series of chemical compounds that you probably can’t pronounce. That’s okay. 

Bowl of Froot Loops- Ingredients:  Loops, Fruit.


Hooray for chemicals tasty tasty chemicals

rallyyy:

the-exercist:

fitblrholics:

If you look at the ingredients list and it’s a bunch of words you don’t even know… neither does your body (x)

Just like if you break apples and grapefruit down into their chemical components, I’m willing to bet that most people wouldn’t recognize the “ingredients” either. It’s a bunch of words you don’t even know:

image

Don’t use these scare tactics - Chemicals aren’t inherently bad. Literally everything is made up chemicals. Trust me, your body knows what niacin is. It knows how to digest fructose and calcium sulfate. Even if you only consume the most basic and “real” foods that are pulled directly off the vine, you’re still ingesting a series of chemical compounds that you probably can’t pronounce. That’s okay. 

Bowl of Froot Loops- Ingredients:  Loops, Fruit.

Hooray for chemicals tasty tasty chemicals

(via stubmle)

jumpingjacktrash:

teratocybernetics:

momothefiddler:

momothefiddler:

transagenda:

codeawayhaley:

According to the laws of physics, a planet in the shape of a doughnut (toroid) could exist. Physicist Anders Sandberg says that such planets would have very short nights and days, an arid outer equator, twilight polar regions, moons in strange orbits and regions with very different gravity and seasons.
Read more: http://bit.ly/1kPLXGT via io9

petition to turn the earth into a fucking doughnut

THE STORY POTENTIAL FOR THIS IS AMAZING YOU COULD HAVE TWO ENTIRELY DIFFERENT CIVILIZATIONS SEPARATED BY DESERT ON THE OUTSIDE AND AN PERMANENT NIGHT-WINTER ON THE INSIDEYOU COULD (WITH A LITTLE FUDGING ON TIDES OR SOME STABILIZATION FORCE) HAVE MOONS THAT GO THROUGH THE FUCKING HOLE, WITH LUNAR-POWERED SORCERERS LIVING ON THE INNER EQUATOR IN GIANT ICE CASTLES WAITING FOR THE TIME OF THE MONTH WHEN THE MOON ILLUMINATES THE ETERNAL NIGHTTIME AND THEIR SPELLS HAVE THE MOST POWER
YOU COULD HAVE ENTIRELY DIFFERENT SPECIES THAT EVOLVED ON OPPOSITE SIDES WHO ARE BASICALLY ALIENS ON THE SAME PLANET AND WHOEVER CROSSES THE GIANT DESERT OR ARCTIC CIRCLE (HEH) MAKES FIRST CONTACT
THIS IS SO COOL
THIS IS SO COOL
I WANT TO RUN FIFTY THOUSAND GAMES ON WORLDS LIKE THIS HOLY FUCK

THIS JUST IN IF I’M UNDERSTANDING THE MAGNETIC FIELDS CORRECTLY I THINK THE ETERNAL NIGHT ICE REALM WILL HAVE NEAR-CONSTANT ELECTRICAL STORMS

Re-reblogging for the additional stuff.

this is the coolest article oh wow


…..I’ve found my new home…WENDELL!!! BRING MY CHISEL WE’VE AN ICE CASTLE TO CONSTRUCT!

jumpingjacktrash:

teratocybernetics:

momothefiddler:

momothefiddler:

transagenda:

codeawayhaley:

According to the laws of physics, a planet in the shape of a doughnut (toroid) could exist. Physicist Anders Sandberg says that such planets would have very short nights and days, an arid outer equator, twilight polar regions, moons in strange orbits and regions with very different gravity and seasons.

Read more: http://bit.ly/1kPLXGT via io9

petition to turn the earth into a fucking doughnut

THE STORY POTENTIAL FOR THIS IS AMAZING YOU COULD HAVE TWO ENTIRELY DIFFERENT CIVILIZATIONS SEPARATED BY DESERT ON THE OUTSIDE AND AN PERMANENT NIGHT-WINTER ON THE INSIDE

YOU COULD (WITH A LITTLE FUDGING ON TIDES OR SOME STABILIZATION FORCE) HAVE MOONS THAT GO THROUGH THE FUCKING HOLE, WITH LUNAR-POWERED SORCERERS LIVING ON THE INNER EQUATOR IN GIANT ICE CASTLES WAITING FOR THE TIME OF THE MONTH WHEN THE MOON ILLUMINATES THE ETERNAL NIGHTTIME AND THEIR SPELLS HAVE THE MOST POWER

YOU COULD HAVE ENTIRELY DIFFERENT SPECIES THAT EVOLVED ON OPPOSITE SIDES WHO ARE BASICALLY ALIENS ON THE SAME PLANET AND WHOEVER CROSSES THE GIANT DESERT OR ARCTIC CIRCLE (HEH) MAKES FIRST CONTACT

THIS IS SO COOL

THIS IS SO COOL

I WANT TO RUN FIFTY THOUSAND GAMES ON WORLDS LIKE THIS HOLY FUCK

THIS JUST IN IF I’M UNDERSTANDING THE MAGNETIC FIELDS CORRECTLY I THINK THE ETERNAL NIGHT ICE REALM WILL HAVE NEAR-CONSTANT ELECTRICAL STORMS

Re-reblogging for the additional stuff.

this is the coolest article oh wow

…..I’ve found my new home…WENDELL!!! BRING MY CHISEL WE’VE AN ICE CASTLE TO CONSTRUCT!

(via eszturd)

bit-of-a-timelord:

If there ever comes a day I don’t reblog this just assume the worst okay.

(via rabbitofsaturn)

swolizard:

ohitsjustgreg:

buttcheekpalmkang:

chellzisyeezus:

She mumbled something rude under her breaf

"Your mama was a circus bear"

"Yo Berenstein lookin’ Ass"

"so this is what you’ve been doing since little bear"

This interview is “unbearable”

swolizard:

ohitsjustgreg:

buttcheekpalmkang:

chellzisyeezus:

She mumbled something rude under her breaf

"Your mama was a circus bear"

"Yo Berenstein lookin’ Ass"

"so this is what you’ve been doing since little bear"

This interview is “unbearable”

(via drthunder138)

*add in the lobby scene music from the first matrix* FUCKING GOLD

(via the-absolute-funniest-posts)

westernkanye:

DON’T TOUCH ME I’M STERILE

westernkanye:

DON’T TOUCH ME I’M STERILE

(via stubmle)